INTERACTIVE ISO-IEC-27001-LEAD-IMPLEMENTER QUESTIONS & ISO-IEC-27001-LEAD-IMPLEMENTER POSITIVE FEEDBACK

Interactive ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer Questions & ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer Positive Feedback

Interactive ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer Questions & ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer Positive Feedback

Blog Article

Tags: Interactive ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer Questions, ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer Positive Feedback, ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer Reliable Test Syllabus, Exam ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer Demo, ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer Valid Torrent

DOWNLOAD the newest Prep4pass ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer PDF dumps from Cloud Storage for free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1pwiCCzQNRHIFzbsfE5IaF9AuIUzokDoJ

The contents of ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer study materials are all compiled by industry experts based on the examination outlines and industry development trends over the years. And our ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer exam guide has its own system and levels of hierarchy, which can make users improve effectively. Our ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer learning dumps can simulate the real test environment. After the exam is over, the system also gives the total score and correct answer rate.

PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer exam is designed to test the knowledge and skills of individuals who are responsible for implementing and maintaining an Information Security Management System (ISMS) based on the ISO/IEC 27001 standard. PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Implementer Exam certification is offered by the Professional Evaluation and Certification Board (PECB), an internationally recognized certification body that provides training and certification programs in various fields, including information security.

PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer Certification Exam is a prestigious certification that recognizes individuals with the knowledge and skills necessary to implement and maintain an Information Security Management System (ISMS) in accordance with ISO/IEC 27001 standards. PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Implementer Exam certification is offered by the Professional Evaluation and Certification Board (PECB), a leading provider of international certification services for individuals and organizations.

>> Interactive ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer Questions <<

ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer Positive Feedback | ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer Reliable Test Syllabus

As the saying goes, to develop study interest requires to giving learner a good key for study, this is promoting learner active development of internal factors. The most function of our ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer question torrent is to help our customers develop a good study habits, cultivate interest in learning and make them pass their exam easily and get their ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer Certification. All workers of our company are working together, in order to produce a high-quality product for candidates. I believe that our ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer exam torrent will be very useful for your future.

PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Implementer Exam Sample Questions (Q165-Q170):

NEW QUESTION # 165
An organization has decided to conduct information security awareness and training sessions on a monthly basis for all employees. Only 45% of employees who attended these sessions were able to pass the exam.
What does the percentage represent?

  • A. Measurement objective
  • B. Performance indicator
  • C. Attribute

Answer: B

Explanation:
Explanation
According to the ISO/IEC 27001:2022 standard, a performance indicator is "a metric that provides information about the effectiveness or efficiency of an activity, process, system or organization" (section 3.35). A performance indicator should be measurable, relevant, achievable, realistic and time-bound (SMART). In this case, the percentage of employees who passed the exam is a performance indicator that measures the effectiveness of the information security awareness and training sessions. It shows how well the sessions achieved their intended learning outcomes and how well the employees understood the information security concepts and practices.
References:
ISO/IEC 27001:2022, Information security, cybersecurity and privacy protection - Information security management systems - Requirements1 ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Implementer Info Kit Key performance indicators for an ISO 27001 ISMS2


NEW QUESTION # 166
Scenario 10:
NetworkFuse is a leading company that specializes in the design, production, and distribution of network hardware products. Over the past two years, NetworkFuse has maintained an operational Information Security Management System (ISMS) based on ISO/IEC 27001 requirements and a Quality Management System (QMS) based on ISO 9001. These systems are designed to ensure the company's commitment to both information security and the highest quality standards.
To further demonstrate its dedication to best practices and industry standards, NetworkFuse recently scheduled a combined certification audit. This audit seeks to validate NetworkFuse's compliance with both ISO/IEC 27001 and ISO 9001, showcasing the company's strong commitment to maintaining high standards in information security management and quality management. The process began with the careful selection of a certification body. NetworkFuse then took steps to prepare its employees for the audit, which was crucial for ensuring a smooth and successful audit process. Additionally, NetworkFuse appointed individuals to manage the ISMS and the QMS.
NetworkFuse decided not to conduct a self-evaluation before the audit, a step often taken by organizations to proactively identify potential areas for improvement. The company's top management believed such an evaluation was unnecessary, confident in their existing systems and practices. This decision reflected their trust in the robustness of their ISMS and QMS. As part of the preparations, NetworkFuse took careful measures to ensure that all necessary documented information-including internal audit reports, management reviews, technological infrastructure, and the overall functioning of the ISMS and QMS-was readily available for the audit. This information would be vital in demonstrating their compliance with the ISO standards.
During the audit, NetworkFuse requested that the certification body not carry documentation off-site. This request stemmed from their commitment to safeguarding sensitive and proprietary information, reflecting their desire for maximum security and control during the audit process. Despite meticulous preparations, the actual audit did not proceed as scheduled. NetworkFuse raised concerns about the assigned audit team leader and requested a replacement. The company asserted that the same audit team leader had previously issued a recommendation for certification to one of NetworkFuse's main competitors. This potential conflict of interest raised concerns among the company's top management. However, the certification body rejected NetworkFuse's request for a replacement, and the audit process was canceled.
Which of the following actions is NOT a requirement for NetworkFuse in preparing for the certification audit?

  • A. Identifying subject matter experts
  • B. Preparing the personnel
  • C. Gathering documented information

Answer: A


NEW QUESTION # 167
Scenario 9:
OpenTech, headquartered in San Francisco, specializes in information and communication technology (ICT) solutions. Its clientele primarily includes data communication enterprises and network operators. The company's core objective is to enable its clients to transition smoothly into multi-service providers, aligning their operations with the complex demands of the digital landscape.
Recently, Tim, the internal auditor of OpenTech, conducted an internal audit that uncovered nonconformities related to their monitoring procedures and system vulnerabilities. In response to these nonconformities, OpenTech decided to employ a comprehensive problem-solving approach to address the issues systematically. This method encompasses a team-oriented approach, aiming to identify, correct, and eliminate the root causes of the issues. The approach involves several steps: First, establish a group of experts with deep knowledge of processes and controls. Next, break down the nonconformity into measurable components and implement interim containment measures. Then, identify potential root causes and select and verify permanent corrective actions. Finally, put those actions into practice, validate them, take steps to prevent recurrence, and recognize and acknowledge the team's efforts.
Following the analysis of the root causes of the nonconformities, OpenTech's ISMS project manager, Julia, developed a list of potential actions to address the identified nonconformities. Julia carefully evaluated the list to ensure that each action would effectively eliminate the root cause of the respective nonconformity. While assessing potential corrective actions, Julia identified one issue as significant and assessed a high likelihood of its recurrence. Consequently, she chose to implement temporary corrective actions. Julia then combined all the nonconformities into a single action plan and sought approval from top management. The submitted action plan was written as follows:
"A new version of the access control policy will be established and new restrictions will be created to ensure that network access is effectively managed and monitored by the Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Department." However, Julia's submitted action plan was not approved by top management. The reason cited was that a general action plan meant to address all nonconformities was deemed unacceptable. Consequently, Julia revised the action plan and submitted separate ones for approval. Unfortunately, Julia did not adhere to the organization's specified deadline for submission, resulting in a delay in the corrective action process. Additionally, the revised action plans lacked a defined schedule for execution.
Did Julia's approach to submitting action plans for addressing nonconformities align with best practices?

  • A. Yes, Julia revised the action plan to ensure alignment with best practices
  • B. No, as action plans are typically expected to meet specified deadlines
  • C. Yes, as action plan submission can be flexible

Answer: B


NEW QUESTION # 168
Scenario 6: GreenWave
GreenWave, a manufacturer of sustainable and energy efficient home appliances, specializes in solar-powered devices, EV chargers, and smart thermostats. To ensure the protection of customer data and internal operations against digital threats, the company has implemented an ISO/IEC 27001-based information security management system (ISMS). GreenWave is also exploring innovative loT solutions to further improve energy efficiency in buildings GreenWave is committed to maintaining a high standard of information security within its operations As part of its continuous improvement approach, the company is in the process of determining the competence levels required to manage its ISMS. GreenWave considered various factors when defining these competence requirements, including technological advancements, regulatory requirements, the company's mission, strategic objectives, available resources, as well as the needs and expecations of its customers Furthermore, the company remained committed to complying with ISO/IEC 27001's communication requirements. It established clear guidelines for internal and external communication related to the ISMS, defining what information to share, when to share it. with whom, and through which channels. However, not all communications were formally documented; instead, the company classified and managed communication based on its needs, ensuring that documentation was maintained only to the extent necessary for the ISMS effectiveness .
GreenWave has been exploring the implementation of Al solutions to help understand customer preferences and provide personalized recommendations for electronic products. The aim was to utilize Al technologies to enhance problem-solving capabilities and provide suggestions to customers. This strategic initiative aligned with GreenWave's commitment to improving the customer experience through data-driven insights.
Additionally, GreenWave looked for a flexible cloud infrastructure that allows the company to host certain services on internal and secure infrastructure and other services on external and scalable platforms that can be accessed from anywhere. This setup would enable various deployment options and enhance information security, crucial for GreenWave's electronic product development According to GreenWave, implementing additional controls in the ISMS implementation plan has been successfully executed, and the company was ready to transition into operational mode. GreenWave assigned Colin the responsibility of determining the materiality of this change within the company.
Question:
Is GreenWave's approach to documenting communication acceptable?

  • A. Yes - as the organization can determine the extent and format of documented communication based on what is necessary for the effectiveness of its ISMS
  • B. No - as ISO/IEC 27001 requires all ISMS-related communication to be formally documented
  • C. No - as ISO/IEC 27001 provides a predefined structure for all ISMS communication

Answer: A

Explanation:
ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Clause 7.4 -Communicationstates:
"The organization shall determine the need for internal and external communications... including:
(a) what to communicate;
(b) when to communicate;
(c) with whom to communicate;
(d) how to communicate."
There isno mandate that all communication must be documented. The organization has the freedom to decide what is documented, based on necessity for theeffectiveness of the ISMS(as also supported by Clause
7.5 - Documented Information).


NEW QUESTION # 169
Which of the following statements regarding information security risk is NOT correct?

  • A. Information security risk is associated with the potential that the vulnerabilities of an information asset may be exploited by threats
  • B. Information security risk cannot be accepted without being treated or during the process of risk treatment
  • C. Information security risk can be expressed as the effect of uncertainty on information security objectives

Answer: B

Explanation:
According to ISO/IEC 27001:2022, information security risk can be accepted as one of the four possible options for risk treatment, along with avoiding, modifying, or sharing the risk12. Risk acceptance means that the organization decides to tolerate the level of risk without taking any further action to reduce it3. Risk acceptance can be done before, during, or after the risk treatment process, depending on the organization's risk criteria and the residual risk level4.
References: 1: ISO 27001 Risk Assessments | IT Governance UK 2: ISO 27001 Risk Assessment: 7 Step Guide - IT Governance UK Blog 3: ISO 27001 Clause 6.1.2 Information security risk assessment process 4:
ISO 27001 Risk Assessment & Risk Treatment: The Complete Guide - Advisera


NEW QUESTION # 170
......

Prep4pass serves as a most important source of IT certification information. You can find learning materials and study guides. If you are interesting in our Prep4pass PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer exam dumps, you can depend on our Prep4pass to make a sound choice. Prep4pass PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer test packed so much with the latest information about the certification training. By using our Prep4pass PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer practice test, you have made preparations for the exam.

ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer Positive Feedback: https://www.prep4pass.com/ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer_exam-braindumps.html

P.S. Free 2025 PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer dumps are available on Google Drive shared by Prep4pass: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1pwiCCzQNRHIFzbsfE5IaF9AuIUzokDoJ

Report this page